Saturday, February 2, 2019
Defending Prospero in Shakespeares The Tempest Essay -- Tempest essay
Defending Prospero in The storm In William Shakespeares The Tempest, the character of Prospero brings about a great deal of debate. forward-looking literary critics are quick to use him as a bank none child for English colonial practice in the sixteenth and seventeenth century. Many see him as person who desires complete control of everything just about him from the fish-like monster Caliban to his spirit servant Ariel, even his own daughter Miranda. Others swear that Prosperos sole motive is penalize on his brother Antonio and those associated with the established force out in Naples and Milan. Taken out of context, these are reasonable conclusions. However, in the culture of the play, it is quite clear that these critics are incorrect. Shakespeare does not use Prospero as the symbolization of European expansion westward and although Prospero is quite powerful, he is not a power hungry egomaniac. Instead, Prospero is the very figure of a noble father. He loves his daught er so much that he sacrifices everything to give her the best opportunities for a good life. He is the slave of duty, working for the good of his people. His desire for revenge is also clearly not a motivation as he finds the strength to forgive his brother at the plays conclusion. Therefore it seems that Shakespeares character is not being used to show the dark side of humanity, but earlier the nobility of humanity and the model of a seventeenth century father. When it comes to Miranda, Prospero place never do enough for her. Prosperos second literary arguments states, I have through with(p) nothing but in care of thee, of thee, my dear one, thee, my daughter (Prospero, I, ii, 19-20). Although this line can be interpreted many ways, even as an instantaneously lie, the assumption has to b... ...ritical Study. 336-82. Cambridge Cambridge UP, 1991. Curry, Walter C. The Characters of Shakespeares The Tempest, Early Early Modern Literary Studies. Vers. 5.1. May 1999. Dzelzain is, Martin. Shakespeare and governmental Thought. A Companion to Shakespeare. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Massachusetts Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1999. 100-116. Gervinus, G.G. A review of The Tempest. Shakespeare Commentaries. (1877)787-800. Rpt. Scott. 304-307. Sacks, David Harris. Political Culture. A Companion to Shakespeare. Ed. David Scott Kastan. Massachusetts Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1999. 100-116. Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. Ed. Rex Gibson. Cambridge Cambridge UP, 1995. Snider, Denton J. A review of The Tempest. The Shakespearian Drama a Commentary The Comedies. (1890). Rpt. Scott. 320-324.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment