Perspectives on leadership

Perspectives on coerershipPerspectives on leadingImportance of attractionshipThe quality of drawing cardshiphip is unitary of the to a greater extent or less most-valuable factors in determining the success and survival of groups and scheme. Often effectual lead compensates for lack of equipment and resources. leaders is non necessarily just just ab stunned possessing genuine traits or using a particular fl ar although these atomic number 18 sometimes of the essence(p). Its more about recognizing a goal and being satisfactory to curve and motivate a group towards the action of that goal. above COPIED FROM SHACKLETON, argumentation LEADERSHIP, P. 5 http//books.google.co.uk/books?id=bQ3YcYSASYgCpg=PA5lpg=PA5dq=%22Leadership+is+ non+necessarily+just+about+possessing+certain+traits+or+using+a+particular+style+although+these+ be+sometimes+ consequential%22source=blots=h3OzY7FtNfsig=K8w9Im49rsWdDiDS55rKX39GfNkhl=enei=y61xSpfDBKaRjAeKz_WRDAsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultre snum=1Leadership is the ability of an individual to influence, motivate and enable otherwises to apply towards the soundness and success of the organization of which they are members.Leadership is the ability of a person to set congressmans for others and lead from the front. Its an attribute that influences the environment around us. In surmise leadership it shelf could not be carried out it had to be practiced. In the opinion of employees leadership is that which advances the organization goals while taking trade of employees well being. at that place are two very important components of effective leadership. One is belief and confidence in leadership which is an indicator of employee bliss in the organization. The second is effective communication by the leadership in making the employee understand the business strategy, helping them understand and contribute to the achievement of the organizations business objectives. ABOVE COPIED WORD FOR WORD FROM http//www.paggu.com/wor k-culture/what-is-leadership-what-are-components-of-effective-leadership/Leadership inspires the fol start outs makes them to fatality to try harder and set higher goals for themselves. There are various theories on leadership. According to trait hypothesis certain personality traits whitethorn lead good deal spontaneously into leadership roles. ABOVE SENTENCE COPIED FROM http//www.paggu.com/work-culture/what-is-leadership-what-are-components-of-effective-leadership/ passel are born with inherited traits and some of these traits are particularly suited to leadership. People who are good leaders take a leak the right combination of traits. Traits searing to leaders are adaptable to situations, alert to social environment, cooperative, decisive, energetic, dominant (desire to influence others), self-confident, persistent, tolerant of stress.The research on trait theory has shown that many other factors are important in determining lead success and that not everyone who processe s those traits will be a leader.While the traits may provide peck with the potential for leadership is the capacity to create a vision and utilise it that turns the potential into reality. ABOVE COPIED FROM SHACLETON, BUSINESS LEADERSHIP, P. 9 http//books.google.co.uk/books?id=bQ3YcYSASYgCpg=PA9lpg=PA9dq=%22While+the+traits+may+provide+people+with+the+potential+for+leadership%22source=blots=h3OzY7ECMhsig=hAiLWj-gtOZMQGt5cxNAracTaFghl=enei=X61xSpbIKNmrjAelrs2CDAsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultresnum=1Traits do matter and research in psychology is beginning to show which ones are the most important.Limitations of trait theory are that leadership traits are numerous and pull in different patterns. For example an approach to leadership in the manufacturing fabrication postdates does not mean it would succeed in the aviation industry of the same country. A crisis or an important event may ca economic consumption a person to rise to the source, which brings out extraordinary leadership , qualities in an ordinary person this is the Great Event theory. ABOVE COPIED FROM http//209.85.229.132/search?q=cachecScXwxxv67wJislamicmanagementandbusiness.net/image/Papers/Islamic%2520Management%2520by%2520Mokhter/Leadership.ppt+%22A+crisis+or+an+important+event+may+cause+a+person+to+rise+to+the+occasion%22cd=1hl=enct=clnkgl=ukThe Contingency theory states that there is no best way of leadership and that a leadership style that is effective in some situations may not be successful in others. The optimal leadership style is contingent upon various internal and external constraints. The most widely trustworthy theory today is the Transformational leadership which states that leadership skills can be get the hang by people who wish to become leaders. These leaders inspire followers to go beyond their own self interest for the good of the organization .They make people to move towards a shared vision, they shared knowledge with the employees heavy(a) them knowledge power. This style is appropriate when a new way of life is needed in the company. This style alike increases efficiency by giving ending making power to the front line employees and also allows the leader to use rewards and recognize behavior that will improve the work place. Leadership style is the manner and approach of providing direction, implementation of plants and motivating people.The three major(ip) styles of leadership are Authoritarian or autocratic Participative or classless Delegative or free reign Usually good leaders use all three styles with one of them dominant but leaders guide to use only one style.AuthoritarianThis style is used when leaders tell their employees what they want to be done and how they want it accomplished by getting the advice or feedback of their employees. This style can be used in conditions when you have all the knowledge to solve the problem and you done have enough time and your employees are well make. If you want to gain more commitment and m otivation from your stuff you can use this style e.g. use it on a new employee who is just learning the job and is motivated to learn a new skill.ParticipativeThis style involves the leader including the employees in the decision making process. However the leader takes the final decision. Using this style is not a sign of weakness rather its a sign of lastingness that your employees will appreciate. This style is usually used when you have part of the information and your employees have other parts. By having knowledgeable and skillful employees is of mutual turn a profit because it allows employees to become and feel part of the team and leader to make fall apart decisions.Delegative In this style the leader allows the employees to take the decisions. However, the leader is still answerable for the decisions that are made. This is used when employees are able to analyze the situation and check what needs to be done and how to do it. As a leader you set priorities and delegate certain tasks. You can use this style when you full trust your employees and have confidence in the people underneath you. There is a difference in ways leaders approach their employees. arrogant leaders use rewards to motivate them. Negative leaders use penalties which have a negative impact on the human spirit of their employees. They accept that by frightening everyone will result in higher productiveness but they achieve the opposite. The morale of the employees falls and this leads to lower productivity.Resent approaches of leadershipAttribution theoryThis theory explains how individuals understand events and how this relates to their thinking and behavior and also explains the difference in level of motivation between higher and lower achievers. According to this theory high achievers are willing to take on challenges and have faith in their abilities. On the contrary low achievers are not confident and even when they succeed they think that they are not responsible.Charism atic theoryIn this theory the individual is the centre of attention. This theory is more like derivation of Great Man theory the followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors. Transactional theoryIn this theory people are motivated by rewards and punishments. Social systems work best with a clear chain of command. The leader exercises bureaucratic authority .The basic objective here is task completion. The leader exercises full control over subordinates there is no empowerment of individuals so have to do what you are told.Conclusion All these theories have been followed over the years. Every theory had its positive and negative aspects. There is not one theory that can be followed completely. This is because leadership style varies from industry to industry and company to company. In my opinion the best style of leadership would be a mixture of the different styles.