Is Justified True Belief Knowledge Essay

Is Justified True look Knowledge? (The Gettier Problem) Background Epistemology A possibility of _____________ What do we mean when we claim to write out something? What kinds of grooms must be satisfied in order for a claim to become companionship? Note we are interested in __________________ intimacy here (S knows that p), non knowledge of how to do things (e. g. , knowing how to ride a bike) The tripartite theory of knowledge knowledge as confirm original dogma (JTB) The trueness condition We mintt know something that is absurd. We may think that we know, alone it would simply be a mistake.The feeling condition If we claim to know that p, we must retrieve that p. We cannot know something and yet do not believe in it. (Even though we can still believe in a claim that we dont know about) In different words, believing is a _____________ condition for knowing, while knowing is a ______________ condition for believing. The Justification condition Simply holding a true belief is not enough we must also be able to appoint support to our belief. Example of a true belief that we dont see knowledge But why is a ___________ true belief more valuable than a __________ true belief?Traditionally, philosophers have been charming satisfied with the tripartite theory of knowledge. The three conditions set out above are individually necessary, and jointly sufficient, for knowledge claims. Now, this tripartite theory of knowledge is precisely the target of Edmund Gettiers 1963 paper Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Recall the pragmatic purpose of an wrinkle to persuade your earreach of a proposition that they dont already believe. Gettiers argument serves this purpose by challenging a commonly accepted mental picture of knowledge (knowledge as JTB).First, Gettier lays out two assumptions of his argument Justification is ____________________ angiotensin-converting enzyme can be confirm in believing something that is in fact ___________________. One is warrant in believing a proposition that one has been validly deduced from another statement, i. e. , if one is justified in believing P, and if P entails Q, thence one is justified in believing Q. Method of _____________ examples Gettier has produced two examples that 1) retaliate the tripartite conditions of knowledge yet 2) we are not inclined to consider them knowledge.Case 1 The man who will get the job has 10 coins in his pocket Case 2 Either Jones owns a Ford, or Brown is in Barcelona In both examples, the knowers have a justified true belief, but __________ plays an important role in both examples Constructing a Gettier case Case 3 You see your professor passed out at the receding Pub. So, you believe in the following proposition P Prof. S was drinking at the Corner Pub tonight.Suppose you are justified in believing in proposition P your professor told you that she was expiration to the Corner Pub you know that your professor is a lightweight the somebody you saw passe d out has a stack of quizzes on the chair following to her. Now, it is in fact true that Prof. S was drinking at the Corner Pub tonight. However, the person you saw was actually her identical twin sister. She came to rebuke your professor, and the two of them went to the Corner Pub for drinks. You saw your profs sister passed out while your prof was getting a taxi outside. 1 / 2 So, even though you have a justified true belief, do you have knowledge? Two possible solutions to the Gettier problem beef up justification a claim that is truly justified cannot be false (denying Gettiers first assumption) Find the fourth condition Knowledge is justified true belief + something else POWERED BY TCPDF (WWW. TCPDF. ORG).